[sword-devel] OS X/iPhoneOS based development

[Manfred Bergmann]

Hmm, yeah. Then it would be bound to the library version which would not be a bad thing.



Am 16.04.2010 um 07:47 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:

> Would not the natural place be the bindings directory in the engine?
> 
> 
> 
> Nic Carter wrote:
>> I suggest you put it in a specific place in your MacSword SVN (or Bazaar if that's what you use now?) and I can access it from there.  :)
>> On 16/04/2010, at 2:32 AM, Manfred Bergmann wrote:
>>> Alright then.
>>> Can anyone with the proper rights create a Subversion folder? Or do we use Bazaar? I switched over to Bazaar. :)
>>> I believe I'm admin in Jira so I can create a project there myself.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Manfred
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am 15.04.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Nic Carter:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Manfred,
>>>> 
>>>> This all sounds good.  :)
>>>> 
>>>> Just one quick thing, though:  PocketSword will be one app that works on both iPad and iPhone/iPod touch.  I was looking at this today and I think this will be the best way forward. Apple have designed everything so that this is easily possible, with one codebase...  :)
>>>> 
>>>> Oh, and to answer your question about NSUserDefaults, yes, that's there!  I have just added unlocking of modules to PocketSword, which will be available in v1.2.2 (currently in beta), and that works great using the code in SwordModule.mm  :)
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for this work, Manfred!  :)
>>>> ybic
>>>> 	nic...  :)
>>>> 
>>>> ----
>>>> Nic Carter
>>>> PocketSword Developer - an iPhone Bible Study app
>>>> www: http://crosswire.org/pocketsword
>>>> iTunes: http://itunes.apple.com/app/Pocketsword/id341046078
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/pocketsword
>>>> 
>>>> On 15/04/2010, at 7:15 PM, Manfred Bergmann wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi there.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now with the iPad already released in USA and in other countries shortly I'd like to push for a consolidation of the Objective-C++ SWORD wrapper classes.
>>>>> Which over time has grown quite large consisting of 20 classes in the version MacSword uses. Just for an explanation to others, they build the basis for SWORD based OS X applications and are intended to be able to code in Objective-C exclusively in upper levels of the application (UI).
>>>>> PocketSword uses a subset of those classes with some modifications.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now shortly since I believe we will again branch for the iPad because it will be a different UI eventually I feel that we have to do something now. Otherwise we will end up having to maintain three code bases which could be one. And it will be a mess.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Since MacSword 2.2 was released recently I have some time now to work on this.
>>>>> I would suggest to make a framework of the Objective-C wrapper classes which can then be used in any OS X (Cocoa) based application just as easily as other frameworks can be used. It would still be necessary to have different builds for ARM and Intel/PPC and Xcode projects but those can use the same code base.
>>>>> If any user of the framework needs customised behaviour it is still possible to subclass if really needed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The things that need closer look are:
>>>>> - Make it work in gc and none-gc environments.
>>>>> In MacSword 2.2 refactorings I tried to put in -dealloc and -finalize methods in all classes I touched together with autoreleased initialisations.
>>>>> - Logging.
>>>>> This might need some time. While I would like to be able to write logs to file with specifying log levels this is not something the iPhone/iPad wants due to slower FS access. But I'm sure there is a solution to this. If some protocols are defined each front-end can still implement it's own logging implementation.
>>>>> - Code that uses NSUserDefaults.
>>>>> Right now keys for locked modules are stored in NSUserDefaults. Is this something that works on iPhoneOS?
>>>>> - Searching/indexing.
>>>>> While the iPhone uses the SWORD provided clucene based indexing and searching MacSword uses SearchKit.
>>>>> This not a problem at all but we have to define a protocol where each application can implement a provider.
>>>>> - Further we would need a place to source control it. Can we have a place for it at CrossWire including a new project in Jira?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Comments?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nic, if you are busy with things for PocketSword right now, don't worry. I would start working on this, compare both code bases and would start a discussion with you about things I'm uncertain - if you give your "go" to do this all.
>>>>> I'd also like to finally put in some Unit tests for critical parts so that it can be tested more easily. Unfortunately Unit testing is not so comfortable in Obj-C as it is in Java.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Manfred
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>>>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>>>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page