[sword-devel] Clucene .09.23 and Sword 1.6.0 / 1.6-svn -Compiling Help
Nic Carter
niccarter at mac.com
Wed Nov 25 21:43:30 MST 2009
Hi there Nathan. :)
I was wondering how you were going on this?
I'm working on an iPhone front-end & am about to start work on v1.1. The main feature for 1.1 is search & I'm examining the various options that I have to do this....... I pulled it from v1.0 due to the headaches it caused & so now I have to face up to it! ;)
Any direction you could give me would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, ybic
nic... :)
On 20/10/2009, at 4:28 AM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> Thanks for letting me know -- I kinda wondered if that was the case.
> I have already deb-ized the .21b for this device to get something going.
> When I have some free time; I will come back and work on understanding what
> sword needs from Clucene and will attempt to make a #DEFINE able patch to
> allow .23 or .21 to work.
>
> As for indexes, I'm not sure -- I understand .21 is compatible with
> 1.8/9 branch of Jlucene. But .23 is compatible with 2.3.2 branch of Jlucene
> and that version of J/C Lucene is much faster, with if, I recall correctly,
> a slightly lower memory footprint. Since the device I'm working with is a
> low memory and a embedded arm chip; faster and lower memory requirements is
> a very (very) nice perk. ;-)
>
> Nathan.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Talbert [mailto:ransom1982 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 12:02 PM
> To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Clucene .09.23 and Sword 1.6.0 / 1.6-svn
> -Compiling Help
>
>> I'm working on porting the whole stack to another device that
>> does not have any of the libraries yet. I will "use" 21b if I have
>> to to get past the issue. But I would love to use .23 if possible.
>
> I think it would be great to have support for .23. As far as I know, no one
> has worked on this at all. It is important (imo) to keep compatibility with
> 21b, as that is what will be in all the linux distros until .23 is marked
> stable. I would be interested in trying out .23 on Windows though, if it
> proves to be reasonably stable (I have no clue if the indexes it creates are
> compatible with .21b; that could be an issue).
>
> Matthew
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
More information about the sword-devel
mailing list