[sword-devel] Getting rid of BibleCS (was Re: [bt-devel] Eureka!!)

[Eeli Kaikkonen]

Daniel Owens wrote:
> With DM's cautions/suggestions in mind, I created some content for the page I 
> suggested for the wiki (http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Choosing_a_Sword_Program). 
> I envision factual informations about features, not value judgments. It is a 
> place to showcase the positive features of each application. I made some 
> additions to the table already, but I highly suggest front-end developers check 
> the accuracy of what I've done so far. I could have misrepresented your 
> application, and that's not my intention. Also, for FireBible and MacSword I 
> know so little that I haven't really added much.

I have had a similar table in mind. However, it could be organized 
better. Now if you want to add a feature it will become too wide. I 
suggest this:

Use simple icons for describing support for a feature:
     Full
     Partial
     Planned and under work
     Planned and "promised" but not realized yet
     Not needed because replaced by similar or better feature
     No

Group the table in parts according to feature groups:
Platfrom support
Language
Search
...

Platform support
                      Alk BD BT BPB...
     Linux/Unix
     Mac
     Win 3.1
     Win 95
     Win 98
...
                      Alk BD BT BPB...
Language
     Translated UI
     RtoL UI
     RtoL in texts


--Eeli Kaikkonen