[sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

[Jason Galyon]

Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc.
>
> E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being
> installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility,
> I guess the majority of users simply use it on the commandline and
> apache is a bit of an overkill.
>
> Peter
>
> Manfred Bergmann wrote:
>   
>> All right, thanks.
>> Are you working on a 8.10 compatible package?
>>
>>
>> Manfred
>>
>>
>> Am 21.11.2008 um 13:33 schrieb Dominique Corbex:
>>
>>     
>>> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:32 +0100, Manfred Bergmann wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source
>>>> of dominique.corbex.
>>>> The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library
>>>> which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a higher  
>>>> version
>>>> number).
>>>> Any ideas on how to fix it or do I have to build from sources?
>>>>         
>>> On Ubuntu 8.10, you actually have to build Gnomesword from sources,  
>>> and
>>> without xulrunner-1.9-dev installed on your system as it will confuse
>>> the config program. Build either with the libxul-dev package installed
>>> or with the --enable-gtkhtml option.
>>>
>>> --domcox
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>   
If the dependency is not named in the sources debian/control file then 
it is coming from somewhere else, perhaps to confusion related to shlibs 
pkg-config confusion