[sword-devel] Withdrawn SWORD modules?

[David Haslam]

Commercial enterprises seem to have more "clout" in ensuring that superseded
pages are removed by the Internet Archive.

cf. I once tried looking for an earlier free version of PaintShop Pro using
this resource, and found that the avenue had been effectively closed off.  

So maybe someone should dig a little deeper, to find out if they have a
proper procedure.

David


Greg Hellings wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:32 PM, David Haslam <d.haslam at ukonline.co.uk>
> wrote:
> 
>>  What is the legal situation?
> 
> IANL, but my understanding is that it's web.archive.org who is in
> violation of law.  The neighborly thing would be for us to alert them,
> but I doubt they'd do anything about it.  We *probably* have no legal
> liability in that situation.
> 
> --Greg
> 
>>  --
>>  View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Withdrawn-SWORD-modules--tp16900706p16900706.html
>>  Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>>  http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>  Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Withdrawn-SWORD-modules--tp16900706p16904441.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.