[sword-devel] olpc discussion
Jason Galyon
jtgalyon at gmail.com
Wed Apr 25 09:18:37 MST 2007
Python is used heavily in the OLPC software, so you do not need a
separate VM for squeak. I attended the US Python Conference (PyCon) and
heard a good discussion of OLPC's architecture. Python is used
everywhere on the system except for areas like Xorg where speed and
existing non-Python code base is available.
Jason
DJ Ortley wrote:
> You can download squeak and play with it on a Windows box without much
> trouble. I did it a while ago, but I didn't personally like it. Then
> again, I'm not a 12 year old (no comments about my mental age please,
> thank you very much :P )
>
> Though, if squeak promises to be an easy to use programming interface
> that can be manipulated easily, that might be an interesting sword
> frontend regardless. Give the end user the power over what they want
> their software to do instead of us programmer types.
>
>
> I'd like to address the 'connected to the internet' thing a bit. I've
> been following off and on this project, and while the ad hoc networking
> and internet connectivity stuff is big, the machines are designed around
> being something a student can take home and work with.
>
> Go to school, download a couple books from the server or your friends,
> go home and read. That seems to be an important part of the design
> paradigm. If a student has access to the internet all the time with one
> of these, then there's no need to do any work as there are plenty of
> servers out there that provide access to the bible on-line (remember,
> this thing runs Firefox.)
>
> I wouldn't be too concerned about governments/humanists not wanting
> religious software running on these things. It'll either make its way
> onto a machine or not depending on if the owner wants it on there (I DO
> NOT suggest we write a bible launching trojan horse/virus for these
> things...bad idea..bad bad..)
>
> My personal thoughts are that, something like OpenDocument type files be
> made available of sword modules that can be downloaded. Maybe an output
> filter for the OpenDocument format can be created. Then there would be
> the benefit of having files that can be read in a variety of programs.
>
> Of course, the disadvantage to doing that would be that we wouldn't get
> to write code...
>
> -DJ
>
>
> On 4/25/07, *Sean Kennedy* < sean.worker at gmail.com
> <mailto:sean.worker at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> A Squeaky, sneaky Bible application sounds cool. :-)
>
> On 24/04/07, *Darius Clarke* <socinian at gmail.com
> <mailto:socinian at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Also, the complete IDE is built into the image. All source code
> for the IDE is included in just one other file. The image is
> compact since it's just an image of the running memory. The
> incremental compiler is built into the VM so you can test it and
> change it ... while it's running.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> <mailto:sword-devel at crosswire.org>
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> <mailto:sword-devel at crosswire.org>
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
More information about the sword-devel
mailing list