[sword-devel] Catholic module?

[Chris Little]

It could be.  There is a "DRCgb" GenBook that contains the Douay-Rheims, 
Challoner Revision.  But, really, all books could be GenBooks--I don't 
know that we want to go down that path of moving all book types to the 
GenBook driver.  And with the current implementation, it's horribly 
slow.  On the other hand, it simplifies OSIS compliant import/export 
quite a bit.

If you're thinking that we should ship the Apocrpha as a separate book, 
and that it should be a GenBook, that would be a bad idea.  Apocrypha 
are part of Bibles, not separate works.

--Chris

Geoffrey W Hastings wrote:

> Couldn't it be added as a general book.
> IMHO that's where it probably belongs.
> 
> Geoff Hastings
> 
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:43:38 -0500 Tom Pollard <mlpollard@earthlink.net>
> writes:
> 
>>Pham Koi wrote:
>>
>>>Everybody wants to have the Catholic books, but no one know or 
>>
>>have 
>>
>>>time to spend time modifying the code to handle the 
>>
>>deuterocanonical 
>>
>>>books in SWORD code.
>>
>>Would an effort to make the necessary changes be accepted by the 
>>Sword 
>>project?  I understand that that any proposed code changes would 
>>have 
>>to be vetted by the project leaders; I'm asking whether there are 
>>any 
>>reasons why such changes would be rejected out of hand as 
>>incompatible 
>>with the goals of the Sword project?
>>
>>Tom Pollard
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>sword-devel mailing list
>>sword-devel@crosswire.org
>>http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list
> sword-devel@crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel