[sword-devel] Print Bible Features
Jimmie Houchin
sword-devel@crosswire.org
Tue, 20 May 2003 10:26:14 -0500
Hello Chris,
Chris Little wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2003, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
>
>>Subject Headers
> Got that.
Where? Besides the ISV?
>>Read-along References
>>Center Column References
>
> These are the same items I suppose, assuming your meaning of "read-along
> references" is inline cross-refs. This is essentially a style issue and
> I don't see a benefit to supporting both styles as options in the data. I
> believe they should be an issue for the front-end to decide, in terms of
> whether notes are inline or margin.
Yes, presentation is a frontend issue. But is a distilled set of
cross-references available in Sword or elsewhere?
>>Concordance
> Not possible in Bibles, but, as David stated, search makes it unnecessary.
>
>
>>Harmonies of the Gospels
>
> In what way? You can print parallel passage information in a note
> embedded within the section heading, as with the ISV. Other than that,
> gospel harmonies are not part of Bibles, they're exterior works (e.g the
> Fourfold Gospel, which we do have albeit in a different order from its
> most natural.
Yes they are exterior as is much of what is in Sword.
>>Maps (being discussed)
> Got that (meaning images). Should work fine in Bible texts as well.
Good.
>>Dictionary (of some Bible terms)
> As separate modules.
>
>>Book information (at begin of each book)
> aka book introductions: Got that. (not included in all texts because the
> data was either unavailable or the module was produced before import of
> introductions was possible.
Where?
To me this should be general and not specific to a version of text.
The intro, history, etc of a book doesn't change due to Bible version.
>>Messianic Prophecies, ... fulfilled
>
> As a form of markup, sure, you could mark this. When it actually becomes
> and issue and someone marks a text with this data, we can add support to
> the engine very quickly & easily, since it's just presentation markup
> issue.
Do you know of available lists of such references.
>>Many of the names in the text have pronunciation helps.
>> (I'm phrasing that poorly.) ie: Is'ra-el
>> (where do they get those anyway?)
>
> If it's in the text, we can "support" it. I've only seen these in KJVs.
> Where do they get those? I don't know, but they're pretty much
> meaningless since they just give a vague indication of syllable
> breaks/stress assignment.
Okay. KJV is what I read. I couldn't tell you what is in any of the more
modern versions.
> (BTW, in OSIS, pronunciation could be indicated with the xlit attribute on
> <w>. You might add a namespace indicator like "x-pronun:Is'ra-el". There
> are some more complex to set up but ultimately time-saving procedures that
> might be developed in the future, like tagging each proper noun with topic
> map PSI then cross-referencing against an index correlating PSIs with
> pronunciations. The OSIS Linguistic Annotation Working Group will also
> probably decide something for phonetic transcription as well, which could
> be used as a way of indicating pronunciation.)
Thanks for the information. I know I've seen and heard pronunciations
which vary tremendously.
>>I would like us to be able to reverse the process we have advantaged.
>>ie: Instead of going from print to electronic, going electronic to
>>print. Am I alone?
>
> Yes, I think you're alone. :)
Ahhhhh! :)
I'm okay with that. :)
> Honestly, the means I would suggest for
> this process would be to export the data from Sword into OSIS format then
> create an XSLT to convert that into XSL-FO and generate a PDF from that.
> (Or... Todd Tillinghast posted an OSIS to XSL-FO XSLT at
> http://www.contentframeworks.com/Resources_XSLT.html which may be a start
> towards whatever you're aiming to do.)
Thanks for the info.
>>If I were willing/able to scan an ASV, etc. in order to harvest some of
>>the above items, a few questions.
>>
>>Would it have to come from an out of print, out of copyright (ie: older)
>>print copy in order to be legal? Or would I be able to harvest the
>>identical (if it truly is) material from a more recent printing of the
>>public domain material?
>
> As was stated, expired copyright applies to anything that hasn't been
> changed. More recent printings will undoubtedly include a recent
> copyright notice that applies to the work as a whole, but not to
> individual parts (e.g. text, maps, concordance, ...) unless they were
> created for that edition. You might check for notices of copyright in
> those sections, but they may not be indicated, in which case, assume
> recent copyright.
>
> Or just get an old edition and remove all doubt. I highly recommend
> http://www.abebooks.com/ for finding old books, since most of their
> booksellers are knowledgable and include information about printing date
> and book condition.
Good information. Thanks. I am looking for an older ASV. A clean history
would be best. How old does any book we harvest have to be?
Thanks again for all your help.
Jimmie Houchin