[sword-devel] KJV2003 Project -GREEK TAGGERS

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:07:23 +0100

--=====================_83793839==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

>Could you look at Mark 4:8?  Three hEIS' have no correspondence to the TR
>are the tags from a variant?

Generally, it's useful to keep Sword running in the background for reference.
If you look at the TR there, you'll notice two strongs numbers for h-en:
1722 (en; note: NOT h-en) and 1520 (h-eis; nom/acc sing. neut. of h-eis)

Because the original greek text was unaccented, there was no difference
between en and h-en. These two are therefore variants indeed.

To achieve the same result as what is now in the TR (two strongs references
immediately after the word), you need to use tag 1722 (of 'en') for 'some' and
put the other tag 1520 (of 'h-en', or the basis-form 'h-eis') immediately as
empty tag thereafter.

Rijk-Jan

--=====================_83793839==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<body>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Could you look at Mark
4:8?&nbsp; Three hEIS' have no correspondence to the TR 
are the tags from a variant? </blockquote> 
Generally, it's useful to keep Sword running in the background for
reference. 
If you look at the TR there, you'll notice two strongs numbers for
h-en: 
1722 (en; note: NOT h-en) and 1520 (h-eis; nom/acc sing. neut. of
h-eis) 
Because the original greek text was unaccented, there was no
difference 
between en and h-en. These two are therefore variants indeed. 
To achieve the same result as what is now in the TR (two strongs
references 
immediately after the word), you need to use tag 1722 (of 'en') for
'some' and 
put the other tag 1520 (of 'h-en', or the basis-form 'h-eis') immediately
as 
empty tag thereafter. 
Rijk-Jan 
</body>
</html>

--=====================_83793839==.ALT--