[sword-devel] SWConfig or TRegistry

sword-devel@crosswire.org sword-devel@crosswire.org
Fri, 11 May 2001 16:17:53 -0700


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C0DA35.EE5120F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Troy
I notice that settings are being stored using the SWConfig class rather =
than using the built in Registry tools that Borland comes with. Should I =
use SWConfig instead of the Windows Registry? No big deal to me I just =
want to be consistent with what you are doing.
David

------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C0DA35.EE5120F0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2462.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Troy</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I notice that settings are being stored =
using the=20
SWConfig class&nbsp;rather than using the built in Registry tools that =
Borland=20
comes with. Should I use SWConfig instead of the Windows Registry? No =
big deal=20
to me I just want to be consistent with what you are doing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>David</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C0DA35.EE5120F0--