[sword-devel] [Fwd: BOUNCE sword-devel@crosswire.org: Non-member submission from [Joseph Blough <jblough@CreativeSolutions.com>]]

[Troy A. Griffitts]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------1266798E0E893DC27947EB77
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

this message bounced because it was not sent from a subscribed address
to the list.  I'm forwarding.
--------------1266798E0E893DC27947EB77
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <owner-sword-devel@crosswire.org>
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by www.crosswire.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA21066;
	Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:07:25 -0700
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:07:25 -0700
From: owner-sword-devel@crosswire.org
Message-Id: <200108201807.LAA21066@www.crosswire.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: www.crosswire.org: majordomo set sender to owner-sword-devel@crosswire.org using -f
To: owner-sword-devel@crosswire.org
Subject: BOUNCE sword-devel@crosswire.org:    Non-member submission from [Joseph Blough <jblough@CreativeSolutions.com>]   

>From scribe@crosswire.org  Mon Aug 20 11:07:24 2001
Received: from mail.creativesolutions.com (mail.creativesol.com [198.51.241.250])
	by www.crosswire.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA21063
	for <sword-devel@crosswire.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:07:24 -0700
Received: from (exchsrv.creativesol.com) [208.50.255.9] 
	by mail.creativesolutions.com with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1)
	id 15YtRk-0007jS-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:06:44 -0400
Received: by exchsrv.creativesol.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <P9Q9WYC6>; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:06:42 -0400
Message-ID: <C3C2C0D32584044FACBFCA005479770203839DF9@exchsrv.creativesol.com>
From: Joseph Blough <jblough@CreativeSolutions.com>
To: sword-devel@crosswire.org
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] HELP! Need your feedback on XML Markup Language
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:06:41 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain

This may not be a very helpful solution, but here goes.  Why have the
<Verse> tag encapsulate the text?  I was discussing this issue with a
friend, and he pointed out that the verse markers were not in the
original text.  Therefore, would it be okay to use the verse tag as a
marker in the text rather than a tag which is a parent to the text?
Something like this
<Verse number="10" />
is what I'm thinking.  Just another idea to think about.

--------------1266798E0E893DC27947EB77--