[osis-core] additions to <hi>

[Patrick Durusau]

Greetings!

No replies on this one. :-(

Interesting thing is that TEI has <hi> and <ref> that have almost the 
same content models (varies under <ref> with some specialized term 
containers).

Since we put <hi> in for convenience of encoders and I can easily 
imagine a <reference> that has a <title> child, suggest we simply make 
the two content models the same but leave them as separate elements.

I know, I know, Todd, that is not elegant, etc., but to some degree we 
are bound to produce a spec our users will understand without blood 
transfusions from one of the core team.

If there are any NO votes, let's hear them by late tomorrow shall we?

Thanks!

Hope everyone is having a great day!

Patrick

Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> After adding foreign, note, seg and reference to <hi>, the only 
> remaining difference between <reference> and <hi> is that <reference> 
> has <title>.
> 
> Is this a problem? Should we add <title> to <hi> and if so, how to we 
> tell people when to use one or the other? Say <hi> is used only when 
> unknown and otherwise use specific elements.
> 
> Hope everyone is having a great day!
> 
> Patrick
> 


-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org
Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model

Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!