Supplemental: Re: [osis-core] type on identifier and subject,
syntax of content
Troy A. Griffitts
osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 01:24:12 -0700
Just a short note.
And on this rare occasion I almost completely agree with Chris. It
seems logical to me that the identifier TYPE ought to be used to specify
what TYPE the identifier is. I don't see the purpose for the prefix.
And I REALLY don't like it FORCED on
<identifier type="OSIS">lame_prefix_here:Bible.KJV.1611</identifier>
I guess if we optionally wanted to allow specifying what naming
authority the name was registered with, we could do that, BUT forcing it
is like forcing:
internic:www.crosswire.org EVERYWHERE and I still don't like it or find
it useful.
If it had meaning other than naming authority, like
crosswire:Bible.KJV.1611, so you could see who published the doc, it
might be useful. Maybe crosswire:Bible.KJV.1611 might be way cooler
than fba:Bible.KJV.1611. But that's a rabbit trail down a different
path. If we're looking for an EXCUSE to FORCE a prefix right now, then
please don't use this comment for your justification.
-Troy.
Chris Little wrote:
> I don't think I understand what purpose type serves on <identifier> if
> we're going to constrain it to be either "OSIS" or semantically vacuous.
>
> I really don't understand the purpose of the prefix proposed as part of
> the content of identifier/subject, so I'll just identify some sample
> usage and you can let me know if it makes sense or correct me if not....
>
> Take, for example, the book "The Apostolic Fathers" by JB Lightfoot.
> (You can follow along with me at catlog.loc.gov using the LCCN
> 73173713.) I should have (IMO) the following:
>
> <identifier
> type="OSIS">private:Monograph.Lightfoot_JB.Apostolic_Fathers</identifier>
> <identifier type="LCCN">73173713</identifier>
> <identifier type="ISBN">3487046881</identifier>
> <identifier type="LCCall">BR60.A62 L5213 1973</identifier>
> <subject type="Dewey">270.1 20</identifier>
> <subject type="LCSH">Christian literature, Early.</identifier>
>
> I'm fine with the prefix in cases like my type="OSIS" identifier above.
> There, I'm essentially identifying a work ID, and using "ccl:" to say
> that this is the work ID that _I_ claim. This could be replaced with
> prefixes from groups who want to act as naming authorities if they
> should become established.
>
> From Todd's message....
>
>> Either 1) type="ISBN" plays no role in interpreting the system of
>> identifiers
>> that the body of <identifier> comes from AND a prefix is required
>> OR 2) type="ISBN" acts in the role of a work prefix and a work prefix is
>> not necessary
>>
>> In case #1, the type attribute only serves as a guide but does NOT add
>> to the interpretation of the value in the body of <identifier>.
>>
>> In case #2, the type attribute serves two purposes/roles, a work prefix
>> is required in cases where type="OSIS" is used, AND conflicting
>> "contexts" can be encoded (<identifier
>> type="LOC">isbn:123456789</identifier>).
>
>
> I have a particular problem with the example at the end here.
> Identifiers like this aren't of a "type" which should be identified as a
> naming authority. ISBN numbers are identifiers of type "ISBN".
> Similarly, type="OSIS" doesn't really mean that the identifier is
> registered by BTG, it means it's of the OSIS "type". That is, it
> conforms to whatever standards for identifier creation BTG defines.
>
> Except for identifiers of type "OSIS", the contents of identifier and
> subject elements are unlikely to bear any resemblance to IDs, osisIDs,
> or any other ID-like value. There's no guarantee the won't include
> colons, and many of them include spaces & other punctuation. I don't
> feel there's any good reason to treat them /sort of/ like they're IDs by
> prepending prefixes.
>
> They're just strings, and they should be easily parsed and make sense as
> simple strings without need of stripping prefixes. I feel we should
> just be enclosing the data itself (the identifier value) in the
> <identifier> element--not the identifier plus a prefix.
>
> --Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osis-core mailing list
> osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> http://www.bibletechnologieswg.org/mailman/listinfo/osis-core