[osis-core] Should we allow <table> as a chid of <p> and <speech>

[Patrick Durusau]

Todd,

Todd Tillinghast wrote:

>There can arise cases where a <table> should be the child of a <p> or
><speech> element.
>  
>
Since <table> is a sibling of <p> and <speech> (which I find hard to 
think of a case where someone reads a table off in either a Bible text 
or commentary), I don't see the value of adding it as a child of either 
one. It is possible to encode a table as a child of either one I suppose 
but why would you want to?

Noting that TEI does not allow in <speech> but (improperly in my 
opinion) allows it in <p>.

Do you have an instance of where you gain anything from encoding <table> 
inside of <p>?

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

>We should consider a change to the schema for this case as well.
>
>Todd
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: osis-core-admin@bibletechnologieswg.org [mailto:osis-core-
>>admin@bibletechnologieswg.org] On Behalf Of Todd Tillinghast
>>Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 9:44 PM
>>To: osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
>>Subject: [osis-core] Should we allow <divineName> in <catchWord>
>>
>>Currently <catchword> does not allow <divineName> as a child.  I have
>>    
>>
>a
>  
>
>>case where LORD is a part of a <catchWord>.
>>
>>Should we add <divineName> as a child of <catchword>.
>>
>>See the footnote of CEV 1Kgs.8.62.
>>
>>Todd
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>osis-core mailing list
>>osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
>>http://www.bibletechnologieswg.org/mailman/listinfo/osis-core
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>osis-core mailing list
>osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
>http://www.bibletechnologieswg.org/mailman/listinfo/osis-core
>
>  
>

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model