dictionaries (was: RE: [osis-core] issues unaddressed at the
Dallas meeting)
Chris Little
osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:21:53 -0700
Patrick,
Go ahead & post your findings. I'm heading to Berkeley for most of the
weekend and may be unable to access email until Sunday evening or Monday
(unless I can get this cell phone dialup thing working). I should have
the time to finish a list of elements by then. Seems like our content
model for 1.5 core is going to amount to roughly,
<entry><term>xyz</term><def>123</def></entry> anyway. I recall ThML
being similar, but Harry should correct me on that.
I find the simple model in core plus more specialized separate module to
be a very agreeable plan.
Take care, everyone.
--Chris
Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Current thinking is a separate module. Did some work on it today but
> will await your list of elements.
>
> Patrick
>
> Chris Little wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Todd Tillinghast wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> One issue that I have not heard anything about since the Dallas meeting
>>> is the dictionary set of elements.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Did we decide to spin dictionaries off as a separate module or keep that
>> in core?
>>
>> Either way, I think we should attempt to support easy conversion from
>> exported SIL LinguaLinks lexica since they represent a large body of
>> work from one of our primary users. I'll try to draw up a list of
>> elements necessary to achieve this tonight.
>>
>> --Chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osis-core mailing list
>> osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
>> http://www.bibletechnologieswg.org/mailman/listinfo/osis-core
>>
>>
>>
>