[osis-core] Alpha attached, needs two regexes - osisDivs

[Todd Tillinghast]

Chris,

I agree, we should use "crossReference". 

I was thinking that it was crossreference rather than cross-reference.

Todd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: osis-core-admin@bibletechnologieswg.org [mailto:osis-core-
> admin@bibletechnologieswg.org] On Behalf Of Chris Little
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:09 PM
> To: osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> Subject: Re: [osis-core] Alpha attached, needs two regexes - osisDivs
> 
> Can we camelcase "crossreference" for consistency ("crossReference").
> 
> --Chris
> 
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> 
> > Todd,
> >
> > Done and done.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > Todd Tillinghast wrote:
> >
> > >Patrick,
> > >
> > >I noticed you shortened "subSection" to "subSec" and "majorSection"
to
> > >"majorSec".  These do not occur very often so the extra characters
will
> > >impact file size and I think the complete word is helpful.
> > >
> > >Also could we:
> > >1) add "outline" to osisDivs.  I have been using it to identify
things
> > >that are outlines of books.
> > >2) add "crossreference" to osisNotes.
> > >
> > >Todd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: osis-core-admin@bibletechnologieswg.org [mailto:osis-core-
> > >>admin@bibletechnologieswg.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Durusau
> > >>Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 7:14 AM
> > >>To: osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> > >>Subject: [osis-core] Alpha attached, needs two regexes
> > >>
> > >>Guys,
> > >>
> > >>Have simply run out of time this morning and have to leave with
> > >>Elizabeth. The attached version validates but needs at least two
> > >>
> > >>
> > >regexes:
> > >
> > >
> > >>1. For osisID to provide for the "!" local extension and
following.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >The
> > >
> > >
> > >>current regex is valid but for some reason I have having trouble
> > >>
> > >>
> > >reading
> > >
> > >
> > >>what I wrote last year! Probably just time pressure.
> > >>
> > >>2. The date regex? See Steve's note on what is required.
> > >>
> > >>I can do either or both later today but that will be probably 6-7
> > >>
> > >>
> > >hours
> > >
> > >
> > >>from now.
> > >>
> > >>Note that you should ignore the various annotation texts, what
does
> > >>
> > >>
> > >not
> > >
> > >
> > >>go away will be seriously re-written by tomorrow.
> > >>
> > >>Oh, also missing <discourseMarker> which should have the same
children
> > >>as <divineName> because while I understand the content model,
don't
> > >>
> > >>
> > >know
> > >
> > >
> > >>where it should go?
> > >>
> > >>Well, loading of the car is done, will be back as soon as possible
but
> > >>it is raining hard so probably won't be pushing it too hard.
> > >>
> > >>Hope everyone is having a great day!
> > >>
> > >>Patrick
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>Patrick Durusau
> > >>Director of Research and Development
> > >>Society of Biblical Literature
> > >>Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org
> > >>Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
> > >>
> > >>Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >osis-core mailing list
> > >osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> > >http://www.bibletechnologieswg.org/mailman/listinfo/osis-core
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> osis-core mailing list
> osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> http://www.bibletechnologieswg.org/mailman/listinfo/osis-core