[osis-core] Counting cp grains

[Todd Tillinghast]

Steve,

I believe the conclusion was canonical items.  

The general conclusion was that <note>s would not be included because
they would be different than what is generally expected based on what
people see presented.  Also there might be differences in which notes
are present and what is contained in a note in different versions while
the scripture text remains the same.  With notes being non-canonical in
most every case it made sense to count canonical items rather than make
a blanket rule.

Todd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: osis-core-admin@bibletechnologieswg.org [mailto:osis-core-
> admin@bibletechnologieswg.org] On Behalf Of Steven J. DeRose
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:36 PM
> To: osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> Subject: [osis-core] Counting cp grains
> Importance: High
> 
> I have a note here that says
> 
> >problem: what about embedded elements like notes, references, etc?
> >Content of all elements is included *Except* for any content within
> >a note, reference, figure, or caption (finegrain refs to the header
> >should never happen). The character content between matching
> >milestoneStart and milestoneEnd are counted just as if they were an
> >element.
> 
> Is that what we ended up deciding?
> 
> Or should it key off of the canonical attribute (which I don't see in
> the schema currently)?
> 
> Or should it just count everything?
> 
> I remember we discussed it, but I don't remember the resolution.....
> 
> s
> --
> 
> Steve DeRose -- http://www.derose.net
> Chair, Bible Technologies Group -- http://www.bibletechnologies.net
> Email: sderose@acm.org  or  steve@derose.net
> _______________________________________________
> osis-core mailing list
> osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> http://www.bibletechnologieswg.org/mailman/listinfo/osis-core