[osis-core] Last Schema from Spain! - <seg>

[Chris Little]

Patrick,

Ah, yes, I see now that it was just commented out.

I was using seg to mark emphasized text since we lack emph.  For that 
purpose, it could be used just about anywhere that we can put CDATA. 
But perhaps a real emph element would be preferrable to using seg since 
seg hampers interchange.  Alternately, we could provide some standard 
seg types.

I was also considering using it to mark the authorship of a pentateuch 
according to the documentary hypothesis, which would require that it 
have next/prev so that it can cross hierarchy boundaries.

--Chris

Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Chris,
> 
> Well, seg is still present but commented out. Todd had asked about how 
> to use seg and it does pose some problems for unconstricted use (should 
> it be in div, p, verse, etc.) and I was thinking (see the comments in 
> test8, that if I had to caution about its use, do we really need to have 
> it?
> 
> Basic issue is how to instruct people on its use. Steve and I talked 
> about it today and I agree that you would not need to go very far beyond 
> where we stop with OSIS 1.1 to need seg but do we need seg here as well?
> 
> Sorry if I did not make more of an issue about it when I posted test8.
> 
> Comments? ("Let the encoder beware!" sort of position? If you want seg, 
> please specify how it should (as opposed to how I put it in) be in the 
> schema.)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Patrick