[osis-core] annotateIssue

[Patrick Durusau]

Harry,

Harry Plantinga wrote:

>I noticed some comments in the schema about how you can say
>bible.nsrva:Matt.1.3, so now I'm confused. Are we allowing both
>syntaxes?
>
Confusion is on my part.

Let me try  to say it in prose:

There is an internal ID defined in the header called osisWork. That ID 
is by default the osisWork value for [osisWork:]osisID.

Ah,

is the separate syntax osisWork="someValue" osisID="someID" ?

It appears that there is a lot of support for the first one (not to 
mention removing at least one of the conflicts you found with XMLSpy).

So,

is the consensus to have [osisWork:]osisID ?

Patrick


>
>-Harry
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <scribe@crosswire.org>
>To: <osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org>
>Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 5:00 PM
>Subject: Re: [osis-core] annotateIssue
>
>
>>>Having a single attribute that can point to a part of another
>>>document really appeals to me...
>>>
>>I believe Steve also thought it appealing for exactly the same reason
>>you stated earlier: it can be used as a string that is easily passed
>>
>around.
>

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
pdurusau@emory.edu