[osis-core] OSIS Candidate Release! - Duplicate mention of <note> and <reference> as children of <div>

[Todd Tillinghast]

<note> and <reference> are listed directly as children of <div> and then
ALSO now children as a part of annotationGroup.  This can cause ambiguity as
to which instance in intended.  The now extra ones should be removed.

Todd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> [mailto:owner-osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org]On Behalf Of Patrick
> Durusau
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 6:08 AM
> To: osis-core
> Subject: [osis-core] OSIS Candidate Release!
>
>
> Guys,
>
> Attached is the candidate release for OSIS_1.0. I really need to have
> everyone sign off on this one as we all need time to synch our remarks
> (and demos) to the final version. (Not to mention that I think I have
> offended all the volunteers to translate it by not responding while
> waiting for the schema to settle. I will try to mend fences after we get
> a wrap to give them.)
>
> Note that I have added more Bible names (as per Chris), fixed the
> content model to allow phrase level markup without a <p> element in
> <div> and gave Troy a synching mechanism that is a list of
> referenceTypes. Got Troy's note this morning hours before any of the
> rest of the team would be awake so just entered it. Differs from a gloss
> in that you could list several other works that you had marked at the
> word level for the creation of parallel texts. Not how I would do it but
> it is probably a way to do it with poorly structured text.
>
> In any event, I need to start working on some other stuff for Rome so
> please read and respond, but don't look for a response from me until
> probably mid-afternoon.
>
> I have learned a lot from this effort, one of which is despite being a
> known anarchist(!) that we need to get better procedures for comments
> and wider circulation and longer lead times for the next modules.
> Suggestions, particularly from those of you with a lot of experience in
> doing this would be greatly appreciated! (I don't think we need a lot of
> debate on the guidelines, just write something up, we will all look at
> it for a week or so and then simply choose the best options.)
>
> I think this beginning module is something that does not do all that any
> of us would like, but it is a firm foundation for building an entire
> array of modules that meet the needs of bible scholars, publishers,
> readers, and of course, bible programmers!
>
> Congratulations on a job well done!
>
> Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Durusau
> Director of Research and Development
> Society of Biblical Literature
> pdurusau@emory.edu
>
>