[osis-core] notesPartsOSIS?

[Patrick Durusau]

Todd,

I really don't think there is a principled difference between a noteType 
on a note and a notePart. Actually notePart is like a subnote and as 
such, I think should be able to bear the noteType attribute.

Patrick

Todd Tillinghast wrote:

>If we think that the enumerated list for types for <notePart> and <note>
>are the same set then we should leave it alone.  In my TEV document I
>used several x- types for <notePart> that may not be what we intend for
><note>.
>
>Here is the list of types I am using exclusively for <notePart> and not
>for <note>:
>x-link
>x-reading
>x-content
>x-refText
>
>This is just a statement of what I did when encoding and that I did find
>a difference between the type of <note> and <notePart>.  But I am NOT
>attached to there being different types for <note> and <notePart>.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Todd
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
>[mailto:owner-osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org] On Behalf Of Patrick
>Durusau
>Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:20 AM
>To: osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
>Subject: [osis-core] notesPartsOSIS?
>
>Todd,
>
>
>>9) Fixed the typo in noteTypePart to be the union of notePartsOSIS and
>>attribute extension rather than notesOSIS
>>
>
>When I search for notePartsOSIS, it should occur in the union statement 
>and somewhere else? In other words, the union call is a joining of two 
>lists already defined elsewhere. At least in OSISCore_0107.xsd, there is
>
>no other notePartsOSIS. (Besides, I think the union with notesOSIS is 
>correct anyway. ;-)
>
>Patrick
>

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
pdurusau@emory.edu