[osis-core] OSIS_0105:5 supplied vs. ampRead

[Patrick Durusau]

Troy,

Troy A. Griffitts wrote:

>>8. supplied: should we retain this and drop ampRead? make ampRead into
>>on of the types of supplied? Cleaner modeling I think.
>>
>
>IIRC, _supplied_ is for things not found in the original language, but
>possibly implied, but have been supplied by the translator.  ampRead is
>for works like the Amplified Bible that give multiple definitions of an
>original language word.... e.g.  "Troy hates [despises, abhors, loaths]
>javadoc'ing his code" (ampRead), as opposed to "Troy hates javadoc'ing
>[his] code." (supplied)
>
Good point. Kept. Need to document. (more a note to myself)

Patrick


-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
pdurusau@emory.edu