<div dir="ltr">No, they are deprecated, but so many methods are deprecated that I was living with the deprecations for now. Personally I would rather only mark methods as deprecated if they still, at least partially, function. If the method doesn't work I would delete it.<div>
<br></div><div>But it is okay, eventually I will hopefully get rid of all of the deprecations and UOE crashes.<br><div><br></div><div style>Martin</div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On 11 April 2013 20:26, DM Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dmsmith@crosswire.org" target="_blank">dmsmith@crosswire.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
They should be marked as deprecated. The idea is that they aide migration, but will be removed in an immediately following release.<br>
<br>
Did I miss marking them?<br>
<br>
In Him,<br>
DM<br>
<div><div class="h5">On Apr 11, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Martin Denham <<a href="mailto:mjdenham@gmail.com">mjdenham@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> Some methods, particularly in BibleBook, throw UnsupportedOperationException. Would it be better to simply remove these methods so that we get a compile error rather than occasional runtime exceptions?<br>
><br>
> Martin<br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> jsword-devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:jsword-devel@crosswire.org">jsword-devel@crosswire.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel" target="_blank">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
jsword-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:jsword-devel@crosswire.org">jsword-devel@crosswire.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel" target="_blank">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>