<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/25/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">DM Smith</b> <<a href="mailto:dmsmith555@yahoo.com">dmsmith555@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style=""><div>With regard to Strong's numbers actually showing up, I presume that you mean as the text of the link? Would you want the same for morphology? (This is just a change to simple.xsl.)</div><div><br></div>
<div>When you move your mouse over them, they show the actual value in the status bar. I was hoping that was sufficient to make it visible. IMHO, I find that the larger links make the text almost unreadable. I think that having a popup with the actual definition would be cool. It would be like a tooltip in that it would automatically dismiss after a bit of time, that only one would be visible at a time, ....
</div></div></blockquote><div><br>It's just that the status bar can be turned off, and having S10 could easily trick people into thinking that this is strongs number 10. Better would be a letter since that would not be confused with a real strongs number, although it would be confused with notes. With strongs numbers however they are not referring to anything visible, so some magic unchanging symbol would be just as useful - in fact would having the words be links themselves be the same?
<br><br></div></div>Personally I tend to read from an ESV, and use the KJV as a reference for Strong's numbers, so readability isn't paramount, and for me, the actual numbers are useful sometimes - e.g. when looking at 'love' you can tell if it's agapeo or phileo at a glance.
<br><br>Joe.<br><br>