[jsword-devel] Pull requests

[DM Smith]

Done. Enjoy. Thanks Chris for the v11n mapping code! I'm looking forward to using it.

In Him,
	DM

On Jan 15, 2014, at 12:50 PM, DM Smith <dmsmith at crosswire.org> wrote:

> I should be able to do it tonight. No reservations. Haven't had time.
> 
> After the pull request, we should plan a release for it and tag it as such. It is a major change. So if we can incorporate it into our code bases, making necessary changes to it, that'd be great.
> 
> In Him,
> 	DM
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 12:47 PM, Martin Denham <mjdenham at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> How are we getting on with the final pull request.  Are there any specific reservations about the v11n mapping code or does it just need a bit more time to review.
>> 
>> And Bible is in a state of flux atm so it would be a good time to try out the new mapping code.
>> 
>> Martin
>> 
>> 
>> On 11 January 2014 13:58, Chris Burrell <chris at burrell.me.uk> wrote:
>> What breaking change is that? Not sure I know about that... ?
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11 January 2014 13:39, DM Smith <dmsmith at crosswire.org> wrote:
>> I think we need to nail the release process and branching. The purpose of tags and branches is to provide stability and allow frequent releases.
>> 
>> From memory, Chris had a breaking change that he incorporated into STEP. This needs to be handled well.
>> 
>> At this point I'll adjust BD for any commits that we decide upon, even if disruptive. So wearing my BD hat, I'm cool with any or all of the pull requests. I think Tonny is the same w/ AlKitab.
>> 
>> So, And Bible and STEP (Martin and Chris) need to agree on what is to be committed.
>> 
>> I'm happy to open commit privs to the two of you. Normal caveats apply. ;)
>> 
>> I have this weekend available to work on this.
>> 
>> In Him,
>> 	DM
>> 
>> On Jan 10, 2014, at 6:16 PM, Chris Burrell <chris at burrell.me.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 one that - happy to do some reviews if that would be helpful. There are a few of mine too, and I'd like to do a diff against the JSword repo and STEP version of the JSword repo, to bring them both inline (as the network graph will suggest, they have diverged quite a bit).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10 January 2014 22:49, Martin Denham <mjdenham at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Could I ask what the status is regarding pull requests.  There is quite a backlog.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Martin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jsword-devel mailing list
>>> jsword-devel at crosswire.org
>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jsword-devel mailing list
>>> jsword-devel at crosswire.org
>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jsword-devel mailing list
>> jsword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jsword-devel mailing list
>> jsword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jsword-devel mailing list
> jsword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/jsword-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/jsword-devel/attachments/20140115/8095ce33/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4145 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/jsword-devel/attachments/20140115/8095ce33/attachment.p7s>