<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Martin Gruner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mg.pub@gmx.net">mg.pub@gmx.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi all,<br>
<br>
I am strongly thinking about a new feature. The current alternative<br>
versification support has one major drawback: it does not yet have schema<br>
mapping. So when you display modules with different v11n systems in parallel,<br>
you will get wrong results.<br>
Until Sword supports schema mapping, we might just have our own small<br>
solution. I just checked, if I only store the data sets of places where v11n<br>
systems differ, it will be about 40k datasets. Too much to compile into the<br>
code.<br>
So I'd like start using QtSql with the QTSQLITE driver. I used it before, and<br>
it is fun. We might do all sorts of cool things with this later.<br></blockquote></div><br>When this has been discussed in the past by Sword developers, a lot of the problem has been data rather than implementation (for example, the Wiki page <a href="http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Alternate_Versification">http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Alternate_Versification</a> says that the CCEL data is "due to numerous errors probably not a prospective source of data for Sword"). What data source(s) were you planning on using?<br>
<br>Jon<br>