[bt-devel] Bible Application for Mobile Devices
Gary Holmlund
gary.holmlund at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 10:56:34 MST 2013
The QML "Text" object supports HTML 3.2 but no css. I did try out using
"Text instead of "WebView" in the Mobile code. As expected, I did see
the text, but it is no formatted in any way by the css.
Gary
On 8/26/2013 7:30 AM, webmedic wrote:
>
> I have been able to load external resources by giving the entire path
> to the local file.
>
> On Aug 26, 2013 2:52 AM, "????? ??????" <kostyamaslyuk at gmail.com
> <mailto:kostyamaslyuk at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Sorry for confusion. Qt call html format they support as RichText
> as opposed to PlainText format. So i'm not about RTF but HTML that
> Qt supports internally.
>
> I would mention again that i did not managed to load external
> resources with it (QTextDocument: neither css or images) and it
> does not support some css features. There is already made
> BibleTime template that works with Qt-Html at Mini repository.
>
>
> 2013/8/26 Greg Hellings <greg.hellings at gmail.com
> <mailto:greg.hellings at gmail.com>>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Gary Holmlund
> <gary.holmlund at gmail.com <mailto:gary.holmlund at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> ?????,
>
> To use RichText we would have to have a different
> renderer. I am not sure I want to make this now. I still
> hope that Qt 5.2 will support WebKit on Android. You have
> had a rich text renderer in the past for Mini. Was it hard
> to make? We can do it at a later date if we decide it is
> the only choice.
>
>
> The engine supports RTF output, FYI. FMT_RTF should get you
> that. It's only used in BibleCS (aka The SWORD Project for
> Windows). So creating the renderer shouldn't be /too/ difficult.
>
> --Greg
>
>
>
> Developing on Qt 4.8 does not seem like a good choice
> since the QML code (Quick 1.0) is depreciated.
>
> I think that developing Quick 2 on desktops is the best
> choice for now.
>
> I am going to look at a single window mode for smaller
> displays. If you wish to work on the install manager, I
> will avoid changes in that area.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> On 08/23/2013 05:06 AM, ????? ?????? wrote:
>> It think we would use Qt RichText for a while. It is used
>> in Mini for a long time and WebKit is an runtime option
>> on platforms that supports it. I know that it is not full
>> functional but it was enough.
>> Or develop on desktops, i simply do not know what a
>> features supply WebKit that Qt RichText haven't (except
>> images, proper css handling).
>>
>> Necessitas project that support Qt 4.8.2 on Android have
>> WebKit support but have QtQuick1 modules only.
>>
>>
>> 2013/8/23 Gary Holmlund <gary.holmlund at gmail.com
>> <mailto:gary.holmlund at gmail.com>>
>>
>> On 08/22/2013 07:25 AM, ????? ?????? wrote:
>>
>> I have tried Mobile on Android, but without
>> WebKit support in Qt, it does not makes sense
>> (fails loading qml file). I also fixed one issue,
>> related to comparison between translated and
>> non-translated strings.
>>
>> Related to WebKit support on Android,
>> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32093
>>
>> I had missed the fact that WebView did not come with
>> the Qt 5.1 Android port. I can see this is on the
>> list they want to do for the next Qt release, but it
>> is not guaranteed to be in Qt 5.2
>>
>> I don't know that we have a good choice now. We could:
>>
>> 1. Continue on developing a QML version on linux or
>> windows and hope the Qt 5.2 (or later) has the
>> WebView for Android. The QML "Text" type supports
>> html and we may be able to use it in the sort term
>> and make an Android version.
>>
>> 2. Wait on the QML version and put more effort into
>> the widget version of Mini.
>>
>> What are your thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bt-devel mailing list
>> bt-devel at crosswire.org <mailto:bt-devel at crosswire.org>
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bt-devel mailing list
>> bt-devel at crosswire.org <mailto:bt-devel at crosswire.org>
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bt-devel mailing list
> bt-devel at crosswire.org <mailto:bt-devel at crosswire.org>
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bt-devel mailing list
> bt-devel at crosswire.org <mailto:bt-devel at crosswire.org>
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bt-devel mailing list
> bt-devel at crosswire.org <mailto:bt-devel at crosswire.org>
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bt-devel mailing list
> bt-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/bt-devel/attachments/20130826/a83e9c9c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the bt-devel
mailing list