[bt-devel] Bt 2.9 Feature - Parallel Bible and Commentary
Gary Holmlund
gary.holmlund at gmail.com
Thu Dec 9 08:11:07 MST 2010
I don't think so. I was not planning any work on the rendering code.
Gary
On 12/08/2010 11:47 PM, patrick at zakweb.de wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I thought about such a feature too. I really like it.
>
> I have been told that the code to do the rendering of the HTML content
> is messy (eg.
>
> the depenency on the first bible) and should be rewritten. This is
> something I
>
> wanted to look into in the next weeks.
>
> Do you think this could collide with your work?
>
> Patrick
>
>
> Greg Hellings <greg.hellings at gmail.com> hat am 9. Dezember 2010 um
> 07:04 geschrieben:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Gary Holmlund
> <gary.holmlund at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Since we won't have a meeting immediately, I will suggest a
> feature I have
> > > been looking into.
> > >
> > > Now in our Bible window we can have parallel Bible versions, but the
> > > commentary can only be in another window and we use the sync icon
> to have
> > > that window track any verse change in the Bible window.
> > >
> > > I have prototyped selecting a commentary as a parallel item in a Bible
> > > window. Both use the same verse key references and I found little
> problem
> > > with this. The main issue I found was that various places use the
> first
> > > module and its type (Bible versus commentary) to determine what to
> do. So
> > > the restriction would be that there must always be a Bible module
> as the
> > > first module. The seems to make sense in a Bible window so I don't
> feel bad
> > > about that. This can be enforced by designing the UI in the module
> choosers
> > > such that you can't remove the last Bible module.
> > >
> > > The module choosers (toolbar icons and the parallel text headers)
> are the
> > > main items that I would need to finish changing. For the Bible
> window they
> > > will need to deal with multiple languages and two categories of
> modules.
> > >
> > > Here is a picture of what it would look like.
> > > http://sourcearchives.com/downloads/parallel.png
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > I think this is a highly useful and very desirable feature. In fact,
> > I thought it was already implemented! Both Commentaries and Bibles
> > are treated almost identically inside of SWORD, so this shouldn't be
> > terribly much different on the interating-with-the-library side of
> > things.
> >
> > I definitely think this is a great idea!
> >
> > --Greg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bt-devel mailing list
> > bt-devel at crosswire.org
> > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bt-devel mailing list
> bt-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/bt-devel/attachments/20101209/dc3d681f/attachment.html>
More information about the bt-devel
mailing list