[bt-devel] Binary packages of 1.6

[Greg Hellings]

I would think that distributing binary packages of those libraries
might lead to legal questions, unless we are also clear about where to
get the source distros... but then again, IANL.

On 10/13/06, Jeremy Erickson <jerickson314 at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>         I have started the process of building binary packages for 1.6.  However, on
> most distros I will have to package clucene myself (Mandriva 2007 being the
> exception.)  I have clucene, sword, and BibleTime packages for SuSE 10.0
> built already, so now I know what I am doing.
>         What I am wondering is how we should handle clucene - should we post CLucene
> RPMS on the BibleTime SourceForge page?  Once I know I will go ahead and post
> the RPMS I have built.  I will continue to work on building more packages for
> now.  (I'll need to do SuSE 10.1, FC5, and Mandriva 2007 after I have a
> chance to reboot my computer so I can install those distros.  I think I'll
> phase out FC2, SuSE 9.2, and Mandrake 10.0 in favor of the newer versions.)
>
> -Jeremy Erickson
>
> _______________________________________________
> bt-devel mailing list
> bt-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel
>