[bt-devel] [ bibletime-Bugs-1468307 ] Searching in Commentaries has problems
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Sat Jun 17 11:40:10 MST 2006
Bugs item #1468307, was opened at 2006-04-11 11:41
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mgruner
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100954&aid=1468307&group_id=954
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Frontend / Search dialog
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wolfgang Stradner (ewst)
>Assigned to: Jim Campbell (jim-campbell)
Summary: Searching in Commentaries has problems
Initial Comment:
Searching in the JFB commentary with Ctrl+O for
'elapse' gives:
- wrong results (e.g. Dan 8:27)
- not all results (e.g. Rev 1:1 missing)
When I started to search in JFB, indexing took place.
(so probably not any older indexing was kept)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Martin Gruner (mgruner)
Date: 2006-06-17 20:40
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=169722
Jim, since you are our search expert I'd like to assign this to you. Please speak up if this is not ok for you. Thanks.
The bug seems to be fixed partly, perhaps by the clucene upgrade to 0.9.12.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Wolfgang Stradner (ewst)
Date: 2006-04-27 12:08
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1385862
I checked it again with 1.6beta2:
The wrong result for elapse in JFB/Dan 8:27 is still there,
(I did not find an occurence of elapse in Rev 1:1).
Checking for other words seem to work quite well, I did not
find other problems.
What is nice, that the order of bible books is correct now
in the list of results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Joachim Ansorg (joachim)
Date: 2006-04-27 10:24
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1486
I did some fixes in beta2 to solve this problem. Let us know
whether it still is buggy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100954&aid=1468307&group_id=954
More information about the bt-devel
mailing list