[bt-devel] KDE4, Qt4, and Windows porting... plus DCOP
Mathias Bavay
mbavay at ivantech.com
Mon Aug 8 08:45:39 MST 2005
On Saturday 06 August 2005 12:09, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
> How does a Windows port better serve the Church?
I'm currently trying to build a CD containing Bibles in various languages
(English, French, Arabic at least). In order to do so, I looked at which
WINDOWS sword front end could be used... And only Biblestudy (partially)
fulfills my needs (modern GUI, easy enough, ... but still a lot to do before
that software to become a real, nice Bible study tool). This is why BibleTime
would be amazingly great. BibleTime being light years ahead of any Sword
front end for Windows, a port would be wonderfull and perfectly needed.
> There are currently 3+ Sword-based Windows projects (one or two claiming to
> be "cross-platform"), in addition there are many commercial products that
> are reasonably priced. (E.g. the free NASB QuickBible.) While BibleTime
> is an excellent app, if the idea is to create a top-notch cross-platform
> app -- it might be better to unite with a project that's closer to
> realizing this goal than create a port to compete with them.
There is no way to re-use BibleTime's code into a MFC, WxWidgets, ... app. QT
is QT, MFC is MFC, ... and the only part that is common to all these projects
is.... the Sword engine (that is already shared).
> Porting
> BibleTime to Windows would be like doing *yet another* English translation
> of the Bible.
One of the great strength of BibleTime is its management of non-English
languages and specially other alphabets. Currently with Biblestudy, there is
the problem that this is based on WxWidgets that does NOT support RtoL
texts... so this is a big problem for Arabic, ... And since the Word of God
has to be proclaimed to ALL nations, that includes non-English speaking
nations ;-)) Another issue is also the Open Source vs proprietary software: I
can distribute CD's containing Sword front ends in the streets (for
evangelization), I can definitely not do it with a commercial/proprietary
software (except if you want people you evangelize to pay for their
evangelization !)
The only serious issue I see with a QT4/Windows port is the manpower... And
this is a serious issue. I would really love to start helping, but I'm still
working on several projects (like that CD for evangelization) and I need to
finish them before starting something else.
Mathias
--
Mathias Bavay
Ivanhoe Technologies Inc.
505-332-2169
More information about the bt-devel
mailing list