[bt-devel] Bookmark behavior

[Martin Gruner]

You are right.
Joachim, should we do a 1.4.1 maintenance release with this and the other 
small fixes that you already integrated?

Martin

Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2004 09:25 schrieb David's Mailing List and Spam 
Receiver:
> I've got a question, is it really the best behavior to remove the module
> information from bookmarks that no longer have the module the reference
> installed?
>
> For example, I run stuff off of a CD now, but I've got a few basic modules
> installed so I don't constantly have to have the CD in and mounted. If I
> bookmark something  in a module on the CD and later run bt without having
> the CD in and mounted the bookmark gets displayed like this "foo
> (unknown)".
>
> Now normally this would be fine, except it never shows up as the module
> again, even with the CD in or the modules installed. I did some checking,
> and the actual bookmark xml file and the modulename attribute of the
> bookmark gets set to "". I don't think this should be the case, since the
> user may later have the module installed, and it's hard to guess what
> module a bookmark came from if that information is lost.