[bt-devel] Icons work in new stable release, but not in CVS

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:55:33 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I have no idea what's wrong with the system / distribution.
So many tries and never any success. It's not your fault but probably the 
fault of the distribution packagers.

Is am_edit in your path? Seems like the local copy doesn't work as expected.

Not sure what's wrong gthere,
Joachim

> Hello, Everyone :)
> I hadn't heard anything about this message I sent a week ago, so I
> assumed that perhaps it might not have made it to everyone on the list.
> So here it is again.
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 03:40:12 -0500
>
> "Steven P. Ulrick" <spu@faith4miracle.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 15:53:47 -0500
> >
> > "Steven P. Ulrick" <spu@faith4miracle.org> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:49:42 -0500
> > >
> > > "Steven P. Ulrick" <spu@faith4miracle.org> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 19:55:20 +0200
> > > >
> > > > Joachim Ansorg <junkmail@joachim.ansorgs.de> wrote:
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > >
> > > > > Stephen,
> > > > > thank you for your support!
> > > > >
> > > > > You need
> > > > > 	automake 1.7.2
> > > > > 	autoconf 2.5.7
> > > > > 	libtool 1.4.3
> > > > > I hope that's all.
> > > > >
> > > > > Joachim
> > > >
> > > > Hello, Joachim :)
> > > > I haven't tried to compile the first two items quoted above - I'll
> > > > get those going shortly.  But while looking for libtool 1.4.3, all
> > > > I could find was a SRPM.  At ftp://ftp.gnu.org, the closest full
> > > > version I could find was 1.4.2.
> > > >
> > > > These are the only references to 1.4.3:
> > > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.2-1.4.3.tar.xdp.gz.back-RSN
> > > >.README
> > > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.3-1.5.diff.gz.back-RSN.READ
> > > >ME
> > > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.3-1.5.tar.xdp.gz.back-RSN.R
> > > >EADME
> > > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.3.tar.gz.back-RSN.README
> > > >
> > > > If the SRPM doesn't work, please let me know if you can
> > > > help me get the source of libtool 1.4.3
> > > >
> > > > Steven P. Ulrick
> > >
> > > Hello, Joachim :)
> > > Just got done compiling and installing the following:
> > > autoconf-2.57
> > > automake-1.7.2
> > > libtool-1.4.3
> > >
> > > The first two I got from ftp://ftp.gnu.org
> > > The third, I got the gz file from the SuSE 8.2 SRPM, which is the
> > > only libtool 1.4.3 I could find.
> > >
> > > I then proceeded to get a fresh copy of Bibletime from the CVS.
> > > Next, I manually removed the Bibletime icons that were installed
> > > from the Bibletime 1.3 source tarball.
> > > I then did the usual:
> > > make -f Makefile.cvs
> > > ./configure --prefix=/usr
> > > make
> > > su
> > > make install
> > >
> > > The result was that I still had no icons.
> > > I have uploaded a tarball with the output from all four commands to
> > > the following location:
> > >
> > > http://www.faith4miracle.org/bibletime-CompileLogs.tar.bz2
> > >
> > > You will be hearing from me in a few hours :)
> > > Steven P. Ulrick
> >
> > Hello, Joachim :)
> > In reference to the above quoted message, please find the files:
> > bibletime/pics/16x16/Makefile
> > bibletime/pics/16x16/Makefile.in
> > located in a tarball at the following location:
> >
> > http://www.faith4miracle.org/BibletimePics-Makefiles.tar.bz2
> >
> > Before I wrote this, I ran "rpm -e --nodeps" on every RPM on my system
> > whose name began with "autoconf", "automake", or "libtools"  I then
> > recompiled and reinstalled the source tarballs of the versions of
> > these tools that you told me to install, ran "make distclean" on the
> > Bibletime CVS and recompiled Bibletime using the same commands quoted
> > above.  The result was that I still have no icons.  I do not mention
> > this out of annoyance, of course, but purely in the interest of doing
> > what I can to narrow this problem down :)
> >
> > Again, if there's anything you need me to do, please feel free to let
> > me know.  Also, to be on the safe side, I want to mention something I
> > referred to recently that I heard no response about.  I assume I heard
> > nothing because this isn't an issue, but here goes:
> > The "version" of Red Hat 9 I am running is one I purchased from
> > http://www.cheapbytes.com  It's actual name is "Pink Tie Linux", not
> > "Red Hat Linux"  The only difference between "Red Hat" and "Pink Tie"
> > is supposed to be that to stay in line with Red Hat's EULA, CheapBytes
> > needed to remove all references to the "Red Hat" trademark.  If you
> > say so, I will gladly have my brother Dave download "Red Hat 9" as
> > opposed to "Pink Tie 9" just to see if possibly there are more
> > differences between the two than there are supposed to be :)
> >
> > Anyway, I think I can get a few more hours sleep now :)
> >
> > Steven P. Ulrick
>
> _______________________________________________
> bt-devel mailing list
> bt-devel@crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel

- -- 
<>< Re: deemed!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/cELKEyRIb2AZBB0RAvUhAJsFmuLMrCA1t40LcN7L8RzibmHSogCfUQin
H3AjY1s7vRZAD/BkR8qXWks=
=Arwk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----