[bt-devel] Can I make Red Hat 9 RPM's for Bibletime 1.3?
Lamar Owen
bt-devel@crosswire.org
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:44:07 -0400
On Sunday 27 April 2003 07:55, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> First of all, I need to mention something that I have been forgetting to
> mention: ever since I've upgraded to Red Hat 9, Sword and Bibletime have
> compiled and installed perfectly (except one time :))
Last try I did, I had difficulty. But that was with an older beta.
> Anyway, on to the subject of this message: would you like me to make Red
> Hat 9 RPM's for Bibletime 1.3?
I was gearing up to do this; I won't be offended if you beat me to it.
Upgrading to RHL9 on this laptop was a great thing to do, except for the fact
that the version of BibleTime I was running (more correctly, the version of
Sword I was running) wouldn't recompile successfully. But that's been a
month or more ago when I did that. So, after seeing the pre-release
announcement, I began gearing up to do it.
> very poular. Right below the Source code and the SRPM of Krename) My
> main, potential, problem would have to do with the Spec file. As long
> as the Spec file is in order, I should be able to do the job.
Brook's Mandrake specfile is a good place to start. Or you can modify the
specfiles I did for the RHL8.0 RPM's.
> Of course, I'll do both bibletime and bibletime-doc, if you like :)
Isn't there just one package now?
That being said, I still have access to a RHL8 machine that I can build on, as
well as an Aurora SPARClinux box. BibleTime 1.2 ran great on Aurora 0.42;
we'll see what Aurora 1.0 plus BT 1.3 does.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11