[bt-devel] 1.3 -- volunteers wanted! You!!

[Fred Saalbach]

Martin Gruner wrote:

Yes I was referring to the SF site docs,   However if the mandrake
problem with KDE3 in a nonstandard loction goes away, discussion on the
sf site docs might not be needed.

I looked at http://www.ccss.de/slovo/unifonts.htm.  This is a nicely
layed out site. 

Can the bt docs update start now? or should I work locally and wait
until translation of the existing is finished?
Fred Saalbach 


> 
> Hello Fred,
> 
> > I am willing to update the handbook.
> 
> =) Cool. We couldn't do this without you.
> 
> > How are we handling updates here.  With the .po files, translators
> > should be able to use po files to reduce the amount of translation
> > needed.  In theory the ,po file should bring all unchanged portions
> > forward with a minimum of work.
> >
> > Pictures can be updated with no disruption to the translators, as these
> > stand alone.  Do these need to be updated to bibletime 1.2 (not much
> > change).
> 
> Joachim, could you comment on this please?
> 
> > Do you think I should change the site docs on installation to note the
> > kde3 mandrake cooker version issues?
> 
> Which site docs? sf?
> 
> What needs to be updated in the handbook is the fonts section again. Please
> describe the process using kcontrol's awesome features. It will install the
> fonts, and configure ghostscript (and staroffice) correctly. And we should
> update the fonts section to give reference to the better unicode fonts, found
> at http://www.ccss.de/slovo/unifonts.htm. You can probably just direct users
> there and mention the big good fonts such as code2000, cyberbit, lucidia sans
> unicode and tahoma. Font handling has become an awesome lot easier with KDE3!
> Therefore our section can shrink. ;)
> 
> Martin