[bt-devel] suggestion

Brook Humphrey bt-devel@crosswire.org
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 05:12:06 -0800


On Wednesday 13 February 2002 05:06, you wrote:
> I suggest that we from now on not only depend on kdelibs, but also on
> kdebase.
>
> pro:
> -we can drop out all icons which kde provides, therefore making themed
> icons available in BT
> -we can rely on kdebase services, e.g. dcop communication (later)
>
> con:
> -no static build any more (Brook, would you still want to do this?)

Well mandrake at one time included kdebase static also. But it looks as 
though with 8.2 that will no longer be the case.

The only thing I was having a problem getting static was xfree other than 
that I was able to compile qt and kde in static. Or at least I think qt was 
static.

>
> I personally think that ppl who have KDE have the whole distribution
> installed, since KDE became very popular in the recent time. Therefore we
> should not bear a burden which is not necessary. And the static build is
> simply no longer needed imo.
>
> Martin

-- 
 -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
                                                  Brook Humphrey           
        Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107        
http://www.webmedic.net, bah@webmedic.net, bah@linux-mandrake.com   
                                            Holiness unto the Lord
 -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-