[bt-devel] suggestion
Brook Humphrey
bt-devel@crosswire.org
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 05:12:06 -0800
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 05:06, you wrote:
> I suggest that we from now on not only depend on kdelibs, but also on
> kdebase.
>
> pro:
> -we can drop out all icons which kde provides, therefore making themed
> icons available in BT
> -we can rely on kdebase services, e.g. dcop communication (later)
>
> con:
> -no static build any more (Brook, would you still want to do this?)
Well mandrake at one time included kdebase static also. But it looks as
though with 8.2 that will no longer be the case.
The only thing I was having a problem getting static was xfree other than
that I was able to compile qt and kde in static. Or at least I think qt was
static.
>
> I personally think that ppl who have KDE have the whole distribution
> installed, since KDE became very popular in the recent time. Therefore we
> should not bear a burden which is not necessary. And the static build is
> simply no longer needed imo.
>
> Martin
--
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Brook Humphrey
Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107
http://www.webmedic.net, bah@webmedic.net, bah@linux-mandrake.com
Holiness unto the Lord
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-