[bt-devel] Documentation again

[Fred Saalbach]

A possibility here.

We could fork the project and put translated documentation in the fork. 
The fork would contain documentation only (principally the translated
documentation.  Then one or several RPMs / tarballs could be created to
install the additional languages into an existing bibletime
installation.

One advantage here is that the release of bibletime would then not be as
dependant on fast turnaround of the translations.

Fred Saalbach

Martin Gruner wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I think that using the help:/ protocoll makes it possible to display
> > HTML pages. But this is probably only possible for the KHTML widget.
> 
> Well, then let's use KHTML there if it is necessary. But I believe there
> would be a way to feed the HTML text that help:/ produces (am I right here?)
> into QTextView.
> 
> > Hm. Sure, keeping the HTML is useful. But we shouldn't forget about file
> > sized. The doc folder is around 10 MB on my side. This is much too big! We
> > can't force all users to download a .tar.gz file of several megs!
> >
> > But I'm not sure what to do, too.
> >
> > I'm for translated images. If there are not translated images the install
> > script should see which ones are missing and creates symlinks to the
> > english ones.
> 
> Ok. It is not too bad if the images aren't displayed in the HTML files
> correctly via web. You still get the important points.
> 
> Well, we could also put away HTML completely. Then we can't acess the help
> pages any more via web, which is bad because the installation instructions
> can't be viewed without having BT installed.
> 
> Maritn