[bt-devel] rpm creation

[Brook HUmphrey]

On 23 May 2001 20:21:32 +0200, Martin Gruner wrote:
> One last thing we should talk about before the rpms are send out.
> how do we handle the static builds?
> 
> There is a package "Bibletime for non-kde systems", which should contain all 
> of the statically linked versions of BT. So there will be two 1.0 releases -- 
> one in this package and one in the "bibletime for kde2" package.

All the spec files are set up with sword static. The only option would
be to designate kdeand qt as static. As far as naming I can set it up
however you like.


> 
> Now my question is: Should we still call normal bibletime rpm's (they have 
> sword compiled in statically) bibletime-static.*.rpm? I think this might lead 
> to confusion, and we should rather use bibletime.*.rpm as default.
> 
> Any opinions?
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
>